Create sub-folders / enable subfolders in a tree folder structure
under review
G
GK
The Tree Folder structure is super intuitive for all platform users to organize items. I think replacing the 'SUBSPACES' under a workspace with the 'Tree Folder Structure' would immensely increase the user experience. Also, no need to educate new users about SUBSPACE (new jargon) and its functionality. Tree depth can be limited for free users if worried about the resources and implied cost.
Log In
yadavshiv197
I was thinking of purcahsing teams subscription, BUT, was a bit shocked to see this. This is a very basic thing which is must for organising things, while comparing tools, to choose, I didn't even look for this feature as its understood and almost all the competitors have it. This feature might be the main reason for me having to skip on taskade and look for competitors. Hope they implement this soon in future. (Yeah we can link projects, but when thinking of organising a lot of files (Maybe SOPs/Standard Checklists) etc. Having dozens of them lumped together Is not a great way. )
Narek Zograbian
under review
p
patrickw
It's hard to understand that this ticket has been open for 3 years in 5 days.
A tree view that allows seeing below the folder level would just be so helpful:
Workspace
- Folder
-- Project A
-- Project B
And inside the tree view could be "dummy" folders without functionality beyond grouping for now
Workspace
- Folder
-- GroupFolder A
--- Project A.A
--- Project A.B
-- GroupFolder B
--- Project B.A
They wouldn't even need to show up anywhere else for people to have a solution and in the future more could be added
And then again Jira had an open issues for 20 Years "Ability to add watchers during issue creation" with 1123 votes before it got implemented. So sometimes the important but small fixes do get lost
Narek Zograbian
patrickw: You think we can beat that 20 year record? Jokes aside, I've been pushing heavily for this feature. It's not exactly the simplest thing to implement as it requires a lot of modifications to our existing structure.
Here's my proposal:
- Rename our current folders to something like "Subspaces" or "Teams."
- Introduce "Folders" that simply group projects together (think of Gmail Labels).
- Folders would inherit Templates, Agents, and Automations from the Workspace.
What are your thoughts?
p
patrickw
Narek ZograbianI haven't thought about all the implications but the suggestion sounds great.
Narek Zograbian
patrickw Thanks for confirming!
piotreks
Subfolders are very needed, when running automations to create new projects there is a lot of mess after a short time
r
ryantaskade
Merged in a post:
Folders (and subfolders) for Projects
jeremydavis
Would be nice to organize projects into folders. The long list of projects can be...annoying.
jack-s
Any examples, screenshots❓
solutiqa
This is seriously needed for people who have many projects/pages.. AI Automations should be able to create a project within these sub-folders. Taskade team please take care of it.
sonetmark
I am testing Taskade at the moment. It seems brillian in many ways. But the lack of subfolders is a serious drawback.
sonetmark
I use one project to DROP IN quickly research information and I tried reorganise from this pinned but NO WAY TO DO as the menu structure so stupid simple and primitive - THIS MAKE USELESS in many case
brucerfleck
I will preface this by saying that I'm loving Taskade so far. I see huge amounts of potential. While the AI features are cutting edge, some very basic features like nested folders, nested tags, and task priorities as an attribute are missing. These are features that are in most of the competitors like Notion and Obsidian.
Please prioritize these three basic features if possible by the end of 2Q2024. Then, all of us users can focus on the exceptional things that Taskade can do rather than focusing on the small but annoying things it can't do.
austin.stately
This is definitely a feature that is needed. It would help keep things organized much easier than having all things essentially surface level for each project.
Narek Zograbian
austin.stately: Ideally, how many subfolder levels would you need?
austin.stately
Narek Zograbian: Ideally 2 sublevels. Project, Sublevel Folder, Sublevel Items
Narek Zograbian
austin.stately: Are you saying you'd like a folder within Projects? or are you suggesting have a folder in a folder (subfolder)?
So, something like the proposed structure in the image below:
austin.stately
Narek Zograbian:
I was thinking something like this. I like your proposed structure as well. Basically just having the ability to add folders beneath the project level
Workspace
- Folder
- Project
- Subfolders
Narek Zograbian
austin.stately: Oh, I see. So, basically, being able to have a folder within projects? Did I understand that correctly?
austin.stately
Narek Zograbian: Yes, thats correct
Narek Zograbian
austin.stately: Thank you for confirming!
universaldesignz
Narek Zograbian: This should be on us how we would like to organise for some 2 level many not be enough. say Multiple Clints, Multiple Different Projects etc.
springaprilday
Narek Zograbian Is there anyway to get a similar structure like above?
Narek Zograbian
springaprilday Not at the current moment. We'll look into improving this structure in the future.
akkalmohand92
Narek Zograbian hello this is a much needed feature, i was looking for it...
Load More
→