Public API

Share your ideas and requests for the official Taskade API. Documentation available at developers.taskade.com.
iOS custom URL scheme and support
I'd like to use DraftsApp (or other deeplink crafting) to add tasks, notes & ambiguous markdown to taskade. This is definitely a power user feature so I'd be okay with using long node_ids and a number of required querystring parameters Right now I'm aware taskade:// will open the app on iOS, iPad. My request is to include documentation on this for power users (with warning its likely to change if it's not a finalized or public API) for taskade://paths... and/or taskade://...?args... I could include in a querystring to construct a URI that would then add what I passed to it into taskade they be documented. If it doesn't exist beyond taskade:// being registered (to just open the app). Some thoughts I have which would be nifty are: create a project providing markdown in a querystring paramater as a blob (no limit to how much text a querystring can contain) taskade://new?markdown=... or with a specific title taskade://new?title=My%20Project&markdown=... or with tasks/bullets/paragraphs taskade://new?title=My%20Project&tasks=One%0ATwo%0AThird%20Task&bullets=One%0ATwo%0AThree&paragraphs=%0A%0AParagraph%20with%20two%20new%20lines%20above%20and%20below%0A%0A add task/bullets/paragraph/markdown as a child to a specific node_id with an optional querystring paramter to indicate whether it should be top or bottom (defaults to bottom if not present) taskade://add/<node_id>?top&tasks=One%0ATwo%0AThird%20Task&bullets=One%0ATwo%0AThree&paragraphs=%0A%0AParagraph%20with%20two%20new%20lines%20above%20and%20below%0A%0A add task/bullets/paragraph/markdown as a sibling(s) to a specific node_id , with an optional querystring parameter to indicate whether it should be above or below taskade://add/sibling/<node_id>?above&tasks=One%0ATwo%0AThird%20Task&bullets=One%0ATwo%0AThree&paragraphs=%0A%0AParagraph%20with%20two%20new%20lines%20above%20and%20below%0A%0A Adding things is sufficient enough for me, while I'm assuming if I provide a specific node_id I don't need to say which project/block_title it's under.
1
PUT /projects/{projectId}/tasks/{taskId}/date must have start.time include seconds
Figure I'd mention another quirk, although in practice it wouldn't matter that much While PUT /projects/{projectId}/tasks/{taskId}/date accepts a JSON body with two keys of start and stop , they're read differently. You must include seconds in a start.time , like 16:12:00 , while an end.time doesn't care, and both 18:12 and 18:12:00 will be parsed correctly, and be the same time. Another quirk is that the GitBook docs don't explain what format each field is expecting (1st screenshot) https://developers.taskade.com/docs/api/tasks/date While the OpenAPI playground page shows the expected format, however it's got a few problems (2nd screenshot) and body snippet copied below https://www.taskade.com/api/documentation/static/index.html#/Task/taskPutDate The first part of the quirk of the OpenAPI example body sometimes shows seconds on the end.time key, but it only fails if it's not included on the start.time key. The other is that these dates are wayyyy off into the future. Other times it will show seconds on start.time , the values are faked, or mocked which makes sense. It's a superficial issue, but I figured I include it since I wasn't sure if I was supposed to use some other calendar at first, when I started to get errors for not including seconds in start.time :P from the OpenAPI Playground Example Body - different than the screenshot, and sometimes it will render a start.time with seconds, it's random: { "start": { "date": "8692-82-26", "time": "23:44", "timezone": "string" }, "end": { "date": "5809-32-83", "time": "21:56:45", "timezone": "string" } } The error when not including :SS on start.time is the 3rd screenshot and is like: HTTP 500 { "ok": false }
0